The
IFSP as a Living Document
Unlike
the IEP for an older child or other reports,
the IFSP is considered a living document.
As
such, the IFSP document assists in documenting eligibility
for both education and non-education related programs
and services and should be an integral part of the ongoing
IFSP process after early intervention services are initiated.
For example, the IFSP serves as a
document to facilitate the decision on Social Security
Income, Medicaid Home and Community-Based Waivers, and
other HHSS program and services. The IFSP then becomes serves a plan of services for families across all community
programs that serve the child and family.
In
addition, the IFSP document should guide
professional visits with families and children.
The IFSP should be referred to at the start and/or finish of
each service/visit with family and care providers. Professionals
and family members should use this document to reflect
on family/child strengths and priorities discussed and
agreed to at the IFSP meeting. The frequent review of
the document can also assist in guiding future plans,
specific actions and discussions about old and new priorities.
Therefore the IFSP should be continuously available for review and updates based on changing needs. Any team member can raise a new concern or need but the family should determine whether it becomes an actual IFSP priority or not. Reasons that might prompt a new conern or need:
- Child's
growth and development that makes old outcomes obsolete
(accomplished) and new targets appropriate
for services
- Child
or family illness that influences the scheduling or
focus of current services
- Changes
in family finances that may influence insurance coverage
of services or a move to a new community/residence
and new prompt new challenges/needs
- Child
care issues that warrant attention to the providers'
needs and setting specific behaviors/challenges.
- New
diagnosis following appointments with doctors or a
hospitalization
- Adjustments
in team services due to staffing challenges.
Some
of these events may require that a periodic IFSP meeting be
called. Specifically, if the IFSP is to be changed, i.e. if a new or revised outcome is to be added; and/or if services are to be changed or added, then a periodic IFSP must be called.
If no new outcomes or services are needed, an IFSP meeting is not needed; however, the discussion and decisions should still be documented as appropriate. The Services Coordinator will be responsible for assuring that all team members are part of or aware of (as appropriate) of these additions/changes. This documentation may include updates to the Concerns page, Current Abilities Page, or progress statements on an Outcome page.
For
example:
The
Occupational Therapist working with the family
and child on outcomes targeted at reaching
and independent play with toys is informed
by the family that the child has failed to
advance to eating table foods like the other
children in the family at around age 10-12
months of age. The family is quite concerned
about the child's persistent reliance
on the bottle and resistance to any foods
other than three select strained baby foods.
The child reportedly chokes, gags and vomits
whenever the family tries to introduce lumpier
solids or mashed table foods. The family asks
for help in this area.
After
some initial observation of the parents'
efforts to feed the child and some mutual
problem solving, it is agreed that the OT
could offer some assistance in guiding the
family through some new strategies for introduction
of table foods. The OT and/or the parent would
contact the Services Coordinator and if necessary,
ask for a mini conference to discuss the addition
of a new IFSP Outcome. Once all three members
are informed and agreeable, the new IFSP Outcome
page is written, copied and shared with other
team members. The OT would address this new
outcome as part of her already scheduled services.
If
the family raises this feeding issue with
a professional who does not feel competent
to pursue this area of development/intervention,
the appropriately trained team member should
be notified. The feeding specialist would
observe and brainstorm with the parent some
strategies that might be reasonable to consider.
Again with the Services Coordinator, the three-some
could complete a new Outcome page and amend
the Services page (pg. 8) if it means additional
or new professional services. If the feeding
specialist is going to be a new direct or
consultative service for the family/team,
and this is a school-based employee, the
appropriate administrator must also be informed
and approve the additional services.
|
|